Do You Think Advertising to Children Should Be Banned Essay

Do you think advertise to children should be banned? Why or why non? It is an established fact that companies might good from right looking of the childrens role in purchasing process. It is considered to be the case adults be sure to those brands which they are used to enjoy in their childhood. Moreover, acquiring elder, children whitethorn influence their parents quite deeply. Parents escape to arrive at more and earn more to sustain up the deficiency of the time to spend with their children by make almost purchases. Thus, effective advertising addressed to the new audience is in the interests of manufactures. Due to a assert commensurate harmful effect on children advertising is the theatre of operations of wide speculation whether it should be banned or not. It is important to find out which groups of children run the risk. numerous researches describing human socializations process give it in several similar faces (T sufficient 1). This division is genuinely re lative, merely not devoid of sense.The summarized horizontal surface from give to 2 years is not significant for stipulation due to lack of ability to distinguish amid commercials and other TV programs which appears in the second stage (2 6 years). In this stage, children dont tend to deconstruct contradictions in their opinions and are not able to tend difference between their own notion and another point of view thrust on them. At the age of 6 8, children are aware(p) of existence of opinions which may differ from their own beliefs, but do not exhibit the ability to in truth think from another persons perspective. At the fourth stage (9 10 years), children are able to accept another point of view, but are not able to consider situations as an unsophisticated side. Children at this stage are able to understand advertising intent and recognize bias in advertising.However, they dedicate no defenses against advertising. At the terminal stage (since 11 years), teenagers ar e able to set up hypotheses and take into account all possible options. They maintain already got some knowledge of advertising evasive action and appeals. As evident from this analysis, the most defenseless broker here is children aged by eight. However, they are allowed to make just a simple consumer survival of the fittest and rigorously limited financial resources. As for elder children, they have more substantial financial recourses and considerable freedom. Besides, they may influence parents choice in areas much(prenominal) as electronic devices etc.Some people present for ban against advertising. Nevertheless, there are some refutations of necessity to ban it. For example, younger children rely in their choice most on in-store experience rather than randomness introduced by adds. As for teenagers, they tend to use alternating(a) sources of information, parental advice or peers opinions. Most researchers believe that some people have not got the certain characteristi cs of the final stage make up during adulthood. The question arises as to not just advertising to children, but advertising to everyone. In my opinion, the most reasonable way is to control (or even ban in certain cases) advertising of goods such as cigarettes, alcohol and non-nutritious foods.